| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
06/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
31/07/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
|
Autor : |
JORGE, G.; PÉREZ BIDEGAIN, M.; TERRA, J.A.; SAWCHIK, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JORGE SAWCHIK PINTOS, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
WEPP as a tool for enabling a more comprehensive analysis of the environmental impacts of soil erosion. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: INTERNATIONAL SOIL TILLAGE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION. 19., SOCIEDAD URUGUAYA DE CIENCIA DEL SUELO, 4., 2012, Montevideo, UY. [Oral presentation]: paper no. 133. Montevideo, UY: ISTRO, 2012. |
|
Idioma : |
Español
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
También publicado en: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 16, n. especial, p. 268-273, 2012. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Cropland area in Uruguay, mostly soybeans, increased 300% during the last decade due to expansion to new areas. Although no-tillage practices are generalized among farmers, soil erosion is still a major environmental and economic issue. A predictive tool as the Water Erosion Prediction Model Project (WEPP), based on soil processes, has never been used in Uruguay. The objective of this research was to evaluate the soil erosion impact of various managements of intensive agriculture on Mollisols of Uruguay, applying the WEPP erosion model. The model was fi rst adjusted and validated for annual erosion estimates of an Abruptic Argiudoll (Nash Sutcliffe (NS)= 0.81 and R2 = 0.89) and a
Vertic Argiudoll (NS= 0.86 and R2 = 0.90), and later applied to evaluate three Mollisols and one Vertisol with different soil managements. Treatments combined no tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) with different crop rotations. Crop rotations were: continuous soybean (CS), soybean-wheat (SW), soybean-winter cover crop (S-Cover crop), cornsoybean-wheat-3/4 yr pasture (CSW-PPP/PPPP), and corn-soybean-wheat-soybean-wheat-3/4 yr pasture (CSWSWPPP/PPPP). Soil erosion under RT system or CS was always above 7Mg.ha-1 (T value). Pastures inclusion under NT showed values below 7 Mg.ha-1.WEPP simulated an average erosion rate below T for SW rotation with NT (100m; 3% slope) in three of the four soils studied. However, by varying the slope and the length of the hillslope, the range for which the average annual erosion remains below this level is limited (only 3% - 4%). Moreover, for those hillslopes
whose average annual erosion does not exceed the T value, there is still approximately a 25% probability that this may occur any given year. Our work highlights the potential of using WEPP in the development of criteria for assessing sustainability of soil management, alternative to T value of average annual erosion units, including risk analysis MenosABSTRACT.
Cropland area in Uruguay, mostly soybeans, increased 300% during the last decade due to expansion to new areas. Although no-tillage practices are generalized among farmers, soil erosion is still a major environmental and economic issue. A predictive tool as the Water Erosion Prediction Model Project (WEPP), based on soil processes, has never been used in Uruguay. The objective of this research was to evaluate the soil erosion impact of various managements of intensive agriculture on Mollisols of Uruguay, applying the WEPP erosion model. The model was fi rst adjusted and validated for annual erosion estimates of an Abruptic Argiudoll (Nash Sutcliffe (NS)= 0.81 and R2 = 0.89) and a
Vertic Argiudoll (NS= 0.86 and R2 = 0.90), and later applied to evaluate three Mollisols and one Vertisol with different soil managements. Treatments combined no tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) with different crop rotations. Crop rotations were: continuous soybean (CS), soybean-wheat (SW), soybean-winter cover crop (S-Cover crop), cornsoybean-wheat-3/4 yr pasture (CSW-PPP/PPPP), and corn-soybean-wheat-soybean-wheat-3/4 yr pasture (CSWSWPPP/PPPP). Soil erosion under RT system or CS was always above 7Mg.ha-1 (T value). Pastures inclusion under NT showed values below 7 Mg.ha-1.WEPP simulated an average erosion rate below T for SW rotation with NT (100m; 3% slope) in three of the four soils studied. However, by varying the slope and the length of the hillslope, the range for which the a... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
WATER EROSION PREDICTION PROJECT MODEL; WEPP MODEL. |
|
Thesagro : |
EROSIÓN DEL SUELO; MODELOS; MODELOS DE PREDICCIÓN; URUGUAY; WATER EROSION PREDICTION PROJECT MODEL; WEPP MODEL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P36 Erosión conservación y recuperación del suelo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12187/1/Agrociencia-ISTRO-2012-2.-Gabriella-J..pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02940naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1050937
005 2019-07-31
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aJORGE, G.
245 $aWEPP as a tool for enabling a more comprehensive analysis of the environmental impacts of soil erosion.
260 $c2012
500 $aTambién publicado en: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 16, n. especial, p. 268-273, 2012.
520 $aABSTRACT. Cropland area in Uruguay, mostly soybeans, increased 300% during the last decade due to expansion to new areas. Although no-tillage practices are generalized among farmers, soil erosion is still a major environmental and economic issue. A predictive tool as the Water Erosion Prediction Model Project (WEPP), based on soil processes, has never been used in Uruguay. The objective of this research was to evaluate the soil erosion impact of various managements of intensive agriculture on Mollisols of Uruguay, applying the WEPP erosion model. The model was fi rst adjusted and validated for annual erosion estimates of an Abruptic Argiudoll (Nash Sutcliffe (NS)= 0.81 and R2 = 0.89) and a Vertic Argiudoll (NS= 0.86 and R2 = 0.90), and later applied to evaluate three Mollisols and one Vertisol with different soil managements. Treatments combined no tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) with different crop rotations. Crop rotations were: continuous soybean (CS), soybean-wheat (SW), soybean-winter cover crop (S-Cover crop), cornsoybean-wheat-3/4 yr pasture (CSW-PPP/PPPP), and corn-soybean-wheat-soybean-wheat-3/4 yr pasture (CSWSWPPP/PPPP). Soil erosion under RT system or CS was always above 7Mg.ha-1 (T value). Pastures inclusion under NT showed values below 7 Mg.ha-1.WEPP simulated an average erosion rate below T for SW rotation with NT (100m; 3% slope) in three of the four soils studied. However, by varying the slope and the length of the hillslope, the range for which the average annual erosion remains below this level is limited (only 3% - 4%). Moreover, for those hillslopes whose average annual erosion does not exceed the T value, there is still approximately a 25% probability that this may occur any given year. Our work highlights the potential of using WEPP in the development of criteria for assessing sustainability of soil management, alternative to T value of average annual erosion units, including risk analysis
650 $aEROSIÓN DEL SUELO
650 $aMODELOS
650 $aMODELOS DE PREDICCIÓN
650 $aURUGUAY
650 $aWATER EROSION PREDICTION PROJECT MODEL
650 $aWEPP MODEL
653 $aWATER EROSION PREDICTION PROJECT MODEL
653 $aWEPP MODEL
700 1 $aPÉREZ BIDEGAIN, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aSAWCHIK, J.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL SOIL TILLAGE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION. 19., SOCIEDAD URUGUAYA DE CIENCIA DEL SUELO, 4., 2012, Montevideo, UY. [Oral presentation]: paper no. 133. Montevideo, UY: ISTRO, 2012.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
19/07/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/07/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
LEADLEY, P.; GONZALEZ, A.; OBURA, D.; KRUG, C.B.; LONDOÑO-MURCIA, M.C.; MILLETTE, K.L.; RADULOVICI, A.; RANKOVIC, A.; SHANNON, L.J.; ARCHER, E.; ATO ARMAH, F.; NIC BAX, N,; CHAUDHARI, K.; COSTELLO, M.J.; DÁVALOS, L.M.; ROQUE, F DE O; DECLERCK, F.; DEE, L.E.; ESSL, F.; FERRIER, S.; GENOVESI, P.; GUARIGUATA, M.R.; HASHIMOTO, S.; IFEJIKA SPERANZA, CH.; ISBELL, F.; KOK, M.; LAVERY, S.D.; LECLÈRE, D.; LOYOLA, R.; LWASA, S.; MCGEOCH, M.; MORI, A.S.; NICHOLSON, E.; OCHOA, J.M.; ÖLLERER, K.; POLASKY, S.; RONDININI, C.; SCHROER, S.; SELOMANE, O.; SHEN, X.; STRASSBURG, B.; RASHID SUMAILA, U.; TITTENSOR, D.P.; TURAK, E.; URBINA, L.; VALLEJOS, M.; VÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, E.; VERBURG, P.H.; VISCONTI, P.; WOODLEY, S.; XU, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
PAUL LEADLEY, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Syste´ matique Evolution, Universite´ Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.; ANDREW GONZALEZ, Department of Biology, Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; DAVID OBURA, Coastal Oceans Research and Development (CORDIO) East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya.; CORNELIA B. KRUG, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.; MARIA CECILIA LONDOÑO-MURCIA, Scopus Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.; KATIE L. MILLETTE, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; ADRIANA RADULOVICI, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; ALEKSANDAR RANKOVIC, Paris Institute of Political Studies, Paris, France.; LYNNE J. SHANNON, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.; EMMA ARCHER, Department of Geography, Geoinformatics, and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.; FREDERICK ATO ARMAH, Scopus Department of Environmental Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.; NIC BAX, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, NSW, Australia.; KALPANA CHAUDHARI, Institute for Sustainable Development and Research (ISDR), Mumbai, India.; MARK JOHN COSTELLO, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.; LILIANA M. DÁVALO, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Consortium for Inter-disciplinary Environmental Research, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.; FABIO DE OLIVEIRA ROQUE, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Pioneiros, MS, Brazil.; FABRICE DECLERCK, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Montpellier, France.; LAURA E. DEE, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.; FRANZ ESSL, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.; SIMON FERRIER, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, NSW, Australia.; PIERO GENOVESI, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Rome, Italy.; MANUEL R. GUARIGUATA, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Lima, Peru,; SHIZUKA HASHIMOTO, Scopus Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.; CHINWE IFEJIKA SPERANZA, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; FOREST ISBELL, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.; MARCEL KOK, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, the Hague, the Netherlands.; SHANE D. LAVERY, School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Marine Science University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; DAVID LECLÈRE, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.; RAFAEL LOYOLA, International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.; SHUAIB LWASA, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.; MELODIE MCGEOCH, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; AKIRA S. MORI, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.; EMILY NICHOLSON, Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; JOSE M. OCHOA, Coral Reef Ecosystems Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; KINGA ÖLLERER, Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.; STEPHEN POLASKY, Department of Applied Economics and Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.; CARLO RONDININI, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.; SIBYLLE SCHROER, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, German.; ODIRILWE SELOMANE, Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.; XIAOLI SHEN, State key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.; BERNARDO STRASSBURG, International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazi.; USSIF RASHID SUMAILA, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.; DEREK P. TITTENSOR, Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.; EREN TURAK, New South Wales Department of Planning, Industry, and Environment, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.; LUIS URBINA, Coral Reef Ecosystems Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; MARÍA VALLEJOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ELLA VÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, Scopus Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.; PETER H. VERBURG, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; PIERO VISCONTI, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.; STEPHEN WOODLEY, International Union for Conservation of Nature World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN WCPA), Chelsea, QC, Canada.; JIANCHU XU, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. |
|
Título : |
Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
One Earth, 2022, Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Artticle history: Available online 17 June 2022, Version of Record 17 June 2022. |
|
Contenido : |
Human impacts on the Earth's biosphere are driving the global biodiversity crisis. Governments are preparing to agree on a set of actions intended to halt the loss of biodiversity and put it on a path to recovery by 2050. We provide evidence that the proposed actions can bend the curve for biodiversity, but only if these actions are implemented urgently and in an integrated manner |
|
Palabras claves : |
Earth's biosphere; Global biodiversity crisis; Global biodiversity framework; Human impacts; PLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIODIVERSIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02703naa a2200829 a 4500
001 1063438
005 2022-07-20
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009$2DOI
100 1 $aLEADLEY, P.
245 $aAchieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArtticle history: Available online 17 June 2022, Version of Record 17 June 2022.
520 $aHuman impacts on the Earth's biosphere are driving the global biodiversity crisis. Governments are preparing to agree on a set of actions intended to halt the loss of biodiversity and put it on a path to recovery by 2050. We provide evidence that the proposed actions can bend the curve for biodiversity, but only if these actions are implemented urgently and in an integrated manner
650 $aBIODIVERSIDAD
653 $aEarth's biosphere
653 $aGlobal biodiversity crisis
653 $aGlobal biodiversity framework
653 $aHuman impacts
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, A.
700 1 $aOBURA, D.
700 1 $aKRUG, C.B.
700 1 $aLONDOÑO-MURCIA, M.C.
700 1 $aMILLETTE, K.L.
700 1 $aRADULOVICI, A.
700 1 $aRANKOVIC, A.
700 1 $aSHANNON, L.J.
700 1 $aARCHER, E.
700 1 $aATO ARMAH, F.
700 1 $aNIC BAX, N,
700 1 $aCHAUDHARI, K.
700 1 $aCOSTELLO, M.J.
700 1 $aDÁVALOS, L.M.
700 1 $aROQUE, F DE O
700 1 $aDECLERCK, F.
700 1 $aDEE, L.E.
700 1 $aESSL, F.
700 1 $aFERRIER, S.
700 1 $aGENOVESI, P.
700 1 $aGUARIGUATA, M.R.
700 1 $aHASHIMOTO, S.
700 1 $aIFEJIKA SPERANZA, CH.
700 1 $aISBELL, F.
700 1 $aKOK, M.
700 1 $aLAVERY, S.D.
700 1 $aLECLÈRE, D.
700 1 $aLOYOLA, R.
700 1 $aLWASA, S.
700 1 $aMCGEOCH, M.
700 1 $aMORI, A.S.
700 1 $aNICHOLSON, E.
700 1 $aOCHOA, J.M.
700 1 $aÖLLERER, K.
700 1 $aPOLASKY, S.
700 1 $aRONDININI, C.
700 1 $aSCHROER, S.
700 1 $aSELOMANE, O.
700 1 $aSHEN, X.
700 1 $aSTRASSBURG, B.
700 1 $aRASHID SUMAILA, U.
700 1 $aTITTENSOR, D.P.
700 1 $aTURAK, E.
700 1 $aURBINA, L.
700 1 $aVALLEJOS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, E.
700 1 $aVERBURG, P.H.
700 1 $aVISCONTI, P.
700 1 $aWOODLEY, S.
700 1 $aXU, J.
773 $tOne Earth, 2022, Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
